• Seems like a pretty even deal... a "hockey trade". Both teams will benefit. (40%, 10 Votes)
• Is definitely a better deal for Minnesota. (20%, 5 Votes)
• Is definitely a better deal for Edmonton. (16%, 4 Votes)
• I need more time to judge this one.. but I'm optimistic about this. (16%, 4 Votes)
• I need more time to judge this one.. but I'm pessimistic about this. (8%, 2 Votes)

Total Voters: 25

• Yes (78%, 7 Votes)
• No, we should trade him and move on (11%, 1 Votes)
• No, we need a shorter or cheaper deal for him (11%, 1 Votes)
• Not too sure yet.. time will tell on that. (0%, 0 Votes)
• We should be locking him up for longer (even at same price). (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 9

• Sam Gagner (31%, 5 Votes)
• Sam Gagner (25%, 4 Votes)
• Sam Gagner (25%, 4 Votes)
• .. wait, what the hell was the question? (19%, 3 Votes)

Total Voters: 16

• 2007 (35%, 9 Votes)
• 2009 (27%, 7 Votes)
• 2010 (23%, 6 Votes)
• 1993 (12%, 3 Votes)
• 2008 (4%, 1 Votes)
• Wait... what rebuild? (this option is reserved for Steve Tambellini) (0%, 0 Votes)
• 2011 (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 26

• Other (feel free to explain in any of the posts, or the General Discussion section). (49%, 17 Votes)
• Trade the non-long term vets in for some cheaper options / new faces that might work better and just see how good we can do. (23%, 8 Votes)
• Sell the non-long term vets completely.. tank this team and get another top pick. We stand no chance making the playoffs. (11%, 4 Votes)
• Do everything it takes to get into the playoffs (i.e. be buyers). (17%, 3 Votes)

Total Voters: 35