<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oilers 2011/12 Quarter 3 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/</link>
	<description>Edmonton Oilers Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:36:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chucker</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/#comment-43302</link>
		<dc:creator>chucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=10583#comment-43302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-43247&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-43247&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Racki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Have they not been using Eager most games? I think they have. Eager was sick the past game or two, so that’s why he was out. He’s actually been played quite a bit by Renney, I’d say… especially more recently as he seems to be making a name for himself.


I take a bit of a different view on the Yakupov and slam-dunk d-man ideals. I’d say if Yakupov is falling on our laps we trade the pick (if we can) for a big name young defender.. like your Pietrangelo / Weber / Doughty types. Might be easier said than done though. But I think if we fix the back end up with a stud d-man that can play well in his own zone and move the puck up ice, the offense will start to come from other lines. I’m just not sure how feasible it is to have Hall, Nuge, Eberle and a Yakupov. I’d have to figure that we’d be tying up BIG money in forwards. It would be nice, if not for that, however. 


Goaltending is definitely a huge issue.. agreed there.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If the deall is there to get your Pietrangelo type, I agree. Otherwise you wait and trade later in the summer or next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-43247">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-43247" rel="nofollow">Racki</a></strong>:<br />
Have they not been using Eager most games? I think they have. Eager was sick the past game or two, so that’s why he was out. He’s actually been played quite a bit by Renney, I’d say… especially more recently as he seems to be making a name for himself.</p>
<p>I take a bit of a different view on the Yakupov and slam-dunk d-man ideals. I’d say if Yakupov is falling on our laps we trade the pick (if we can) for a big name young defender.. like your Pietrangelo / Weber / Doughty types. Might be easier said than done though. But I think if we fix the back end up with a stud d-man that can play well in his own zone and move the puck up ice, the offense will start to come from other lines. I’m just not sure how feasible it is to have Hall, Nuge, Eberle and a Yakupov. I’d have to figure that we’d be tying up BIG money in forwards. It would be nice, if not for that, however. </p>
<p>Goaltending is definitely a huge issue.. agreed there.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If the deall is there to get your Pietrangelo type, I agree. Otherwise you wait and trade later in the summer or next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Racki</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/#comment-43247</link>
		<dc:creator>Racki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=10583#comment-43247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have they not been using Eager most games? I think they have. Eager was sick the past game or two, so that&#039;s why he was out. He&#039;s actually been played quite a bit by Renney, I&#039;d say... especially more recently as he seems to be making a name for himself.

I take a bit of a different view on the Yakupov and slam-dunk d-man ideals. I&#039;d say if Yakupov is falling on our laps we trade the pick (if we can) for a big name young defender.. like your Pietrangelo / Weber / Doughty types. Might be easier said than done though. But I think if we fix the back end up with a stud d-man that can play well in his own zone and move the puck up ice, the offense will start to come from other lines. I&#039;m just not sure how feasible it is to have Hall, Nuge, Eberle and a Yakupov. I&#039;d have to figure that we&#039;d be tying up BIG money in forwards. It would be nice, if not for that, however. 

Goaltending is definitely a huge issue.. agreed there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have they not been using Eager most games? I think they have. Eager was sick the past game or two, so that&#8217;s why he was out. He&#8217;s actually been played quite a bit by Renney, I&#8217;d say&#8230; especially more recently as he seems to be making a name for himself.</p>
<p>I take a bit of a different view on the Yakupov and slam-dunk d-man ideals. I&#8217;d say if Yakupov is falling on our laps we trade the pick (if we can) for a big name young defender.. like your Pietrangelo / Weber / Doughty types. Might be easier said than done though. But I think if we fix the back end up with a stud d-man that can play well in his own zone and move the puck up ice, the offense will start to come from other lines. I&#8217;m just not sure how feasible it is to have Hall, Nuge, Eberle and a Yakupov. I&#8217;d have to figure that we&#8217;d be tying up BIG money in forwards. It would be nice, if not for that, however. </p>
<p>Goaltending is definitely a huge issue.. agreed there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chucker</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/#comment-43243</link>
		<dc:creator>chucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=10583#comment-43243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I pretty much agree on all thoughts.  I do wonder if Renney gets more than one year though.  I doubt it.  I think there is definitely an agenda to shelter the kids, and he said so, so perhaps he is coaching to what management wants at this point.  I still think he doesn&#039;t use his bench well and has bias against the physical players like Eager.  He should be on the fourth line every game to me.  He is an impact player physically and skates well and is not a liability.  Why sign him if you are not going to use him?

As for the management, there are definitely some areas that need desperate attention, and again, same thing every year.  Go out and get a couple D that make it easier to clear the zone and stop the opposition.  Nothing slam dunkish neeeded here.  There are always serviceable D out there every single year.  Get one and maybe pick up a top guy in a trade.  I agree on Whitney.  I&#039;d be looking to trade him.  You should get a capable defender back and hopefully a cheaper one too if we sweeten the pot.

Khabbi.  Why did we not trade his ass when there was reportedly three teams willing to take him on?  Again, one has to hope he is traded this summer or at the draft. Maybe the fit wasn&#039;t good, but we are looking at another bottom five finish if he is our answer to goal next year.  Dubnyk, I&#039;m thinking this experiment is done.  His potential is to be a &quot;B&quot; level back up at best.  Again, I wouldn&#039;t mind keeping him, but we had better have a bonafide number one who will steal games in net.  No more old goalies.  I want a young guy who will be here for years to come and stabalize the team.  This used to be our strength.  We have not had a good starter since Salo.  Sorry Roloson fans, but he wasn&#039;t a true starter.  I want a guy who can play 60-70 games if needed and play them well.

The draft will be interesting.  I still say we take BPA and if Yakupov should magically land in our laps, we jump on him and pick him.  Don&#039;t forget we still have one of the lowest goals for totals in the league.  As great as the kids are, we could use more offense in addition to woefully needed D and goal.

This is Tambi&#039;s make or break summer in my eyes. No more free passes.  Time to gear up and become a complete NHL team and not a partial AHL/NHL mix that we have seen for three years now.  No excuses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much agree on all thoughts.  I do wonder if Renney gets more than one year though.  I doubt it.  I think there is definitely an agenda to shelter the kids, and he said so, so perhaps he is coaching to what management wants at this point.  I still think he doesn&#8217;t use his bench well and has bias against the physical players like Eager.  He should be on the fourth line every game to me.  He is an impact player physically and skates well and is not a liability.  Why sign him if you are not going to use him?</p>
<p>As for the management, there are definitely some areas that need desperate attention, and again, same thing every year.  Go out and get a couple D that make it easier to clear the zone and stop the opposition.  Nothing slam dunkish neeeded here.  There are always serviceable D out there every single year.  Get one and maybe pick up a top guy in a trade.  I agree on Whitney.  I&#8217;d be looking to trade him.  You should get a capable defender back and hopefully a cheaper one too if we sweeten the pot.</p>
<p>Khabbi.  Why did we not trade his ass when there was reportedly three teams willing to take him on?  Again, one has to hope he is traded this summer or at the draft. Maybe the fit wasn&#8217;t good, but we are looking at another bottom five finish if he is our answer to goal next year.  Dubnyk, I&#8217;m thinking this experiment is done.  His potential is to be a &#8220;B&#8221; level back up at best.  Again, I wouldn&#8217;t mind keeping him, but we had better have a bonafide number one who will steal games in net.  No more old goalies.  I want a young guy who will be here for years to come and stabalize the team.  This used to be our strength.  We have not had a good starter since Salo.  Sorry Roloson fans, but he wasn&#8217;t a true starter.  I want a guy who can play 60-70 games if needed and play them well.</p>
<p>The draft will be interesting.  I still say we take BPA and if Yakupov should magically land in our laps, we jump on him and pick him.  Don&#8217;t forget we still have one of the lowest goals for totals in the league.  As great as the kids are, we could use more offense in addition to woefully needed D and goal.</p>
<p>This is Tambi&#8217;s make or break summer in my eyes. No more free passes.  Time to gear up and become a complete NHL team and not a partial AHL/NHL mix that we have seen for three years now.  No excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Racki</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/#comment-43117</link>
		<dc:creator>Racki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=10583#comment-43117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m curious when our last too many men penalty was. I know we took a lot of those early on, but I don&#039;t remember one for a while. So maybe that has been corrected. Bad line changes... I can see a valid argument there, for sure... they can be pretty frustrating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious when our last too many men penalty was. I know we took a lot of those early on, but I don&#8217;t remember one for a while. So maybe that has been corrected. Bad line changes&#8230; I can see a valid argument there, for sure&#8230; they can be pretty frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G&#38;S</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2012/03/oilers-201112-quarter-review/#comment-43115</link>
		<dc:creator>G&#38;S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=10583#comment-43115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the coaches share the blame with the players for the bad changes. Just like in the real world. If I wasn&#039;t doing my job properly it would be my supervisor/bosses responsibility to point it out to me and make sure I changed the way I was doing it.

Ultimately it may be the players mistakes but it falls on the coaching staff to correct and right now I see no improvement in this area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the coaches share the blame with the players for the bad changes. Just like in the real world. If I wasn&#8217;t doing my job properly it would be my supervisor/bosses responsibility to point it out to me and make sure I changed the way I was doing it.</p>
<p>Ultimately it may be the players mistakes but it falls on the coaching staff to correct and right now I see no improvement in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
