<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Break it Down! &#8211; PP/PK  (2011/12 Edition)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puttingonthefoil.com/2011/09/break-it-down-pppk-201112-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2011/09/break-it-down-pppk-201112-edition/</link>
	<description>Edmonton Oilers Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chucker</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2011/09/break-it-down-pppk-201112-edition/#comment-33182</link>
		<dc:creator>chucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=9210#comment-33182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is also the Lander factor, although I see him taking the same path as Omark possibly unless this great play just keeps on going. 

PK should be better just by virtue of being able to win a face off or two. I am not expecting miracles there either. I would say an improvement to the low 20&#039;s is realistic. My biggest factor there will actually be goaltending.  

For the PP I love what I am seeing in camp so far.  Hopefully that can translate to the regular season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the Lander factor, although I see him taking the same path as Omark possibly unless this great play just keeps on going. </p>
<p>PK should be better just by virtue of being able to win a face off or two. I am not expecting miracles there either. I would say an improvement to the low 20&#8242;s is realistic. My biggest factor there will actually be goaltending.  </p>
<p>For the PP I love what I am seeing in camp so far.  Hopefully that can translate to the regular season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Racki</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2011/09/break-it-down-pppk-201112-edition/#comment-33117</link>
		<dc:creator>Racki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puttingonthefoil.com/?p=9210#comment-33117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve-o: My PP lines would probably be:

Hall-Gagner/Belanger-Eberle 
Whitney-Petry

Smyth-RNH/Belanger-Hemsky
Barker-Gilbert

If RNH makes the team, then either Belanger or Gagner centers Hall/Eberle. If he doesn&#039;t make the team, then Gagner centers Hall/Eberle, Belanger centers Smyth/Hemsky.

I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll also give Omark and Paajarvi some PP time too, even though traditionally teams have 2 PP lines. It will probably be a PP1, PP2a/2b kinda thing. 

I like our PK lines too. I am thinking the guy that slots with Belanger depends on who makes the team. I figure if Hartikainen makes it, I&#039;d put him in there. Chances are that he won&#039;t right away though. In this case, you could go with the dangerous PK option, putting out a guy like Hall, RNH or Hemsky.. or you could go with the safer bet and perhaps ice Jones instead (although I found him and Fraser to be a scary PK duo for early last year... but I think Jones improved a lot in the long run). 

Defense seems to be a lot better, although I&#039;m not confident Sutton will get a lot of hockey in this year. Hard to say who will slot in for him though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve-o: My PP lines would probably be:</p>
<p>Hall-Gagner/Belanger-Eberle<br />
Whitney-Petry</p>
<p>Smyth-RNH/Belanger-Hemsky<br />
Barker-Gilbert</p>
<p>If RNH makes the team, then either Belanger or Gagner centers Hall/Eberle. If he doesn&#8217;t make the team, then Gagner centers Hall/Eberle, Belanger centers Smyth/Hemsky.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll also give Omark and Paajarvi some PP time too, even though traditionally teams have 2 PP lines. It will probably be a PP1, PP2a/2b kinda thing. </p>
<p>I like our PK lines too. I am thinking the guy that slots with Belanger depends on who makes the team. I figure if Hartikainen makes it, I&#8217;d put him in there. Chances are that he won&#8217;t right away though. In this case, you could go with the dangerous PK option, putting out a guy like Hall, RNH or Hemsky.. or you could go with the safer bet and perhaps ice Jones instead (although I found him and Fraser to be a scary PK duo for early last year&#8230; but I think Jones improved a lot in the long run). </p>
<p>Defense seems to be a lot better, although I&#8217;m not confident Sutton will get a lot of hockey in this year. Hard to say who will slot in for him though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
