Andrew Cogliano…

By , July 19, 2011 10:41 am
Andrew Cogliano

Andrew Cogliano

So today the Ducks signed Andrew Cogliano to a 3-year deal that works out to a $2.39M cap hit ($2.15M in 2011/12, $2.35M in 2012/13, and then $2.67M in 2013/14). What is your take on this?

I’ve got a couple of opinions here:
1 – The Oilers made the right choice. Andrew Cogliano’s only role here was going to be a checking centreman. I think we can all agree that he isn’t very good at it. Eric Belanger is cheaper and provides much more quality at the checking centre role.
2 – The Ducks could be very content in the end if they find a role for Cogliano that works to his strengths more than molding him to the team’s needs.

I think the Ducks will be pleased with the contract in the long run. It was too much for us to sign him to that kind of contract, but that’s because we wanted him to be our 3rd or 4th line center… something that he was quite poor at. The Ducks will need to play to his strengths in order to get full value for him. If they intend to continue the “checking centreman” experiment, they will be gravely disappointed and that contact will weigh heavily on them. However, should they use him in more offensive situations, with some PK duties here and there, and solely as a winger, I think they will be content and they could reclaim that player we once thought we had.

I’m sure we can all think back a whole 2 years. That’s when the Oilers nearly traded Dustin Penner, Andrew Colgiano and Ladislav Smid to the Senators for Dany “Fucking” Heatley. The Oilogosphere lit up with worries about trading Cogliano. Most had thought of him and Sam Gagner as untouchables. A year before that, there wasn’t even the slightest question of trading these guys. In fact, I remember some big backlash from fans at rumors of Cogliano being moved after his first season. Things change very quickly here in Edmonton. Players that were once untouchable can’t be run out of town quickly enough.

That said, I am happy the Oilers moved on from Cogliano. The only role he could have possibly had any chance of succeeding at was a checking centre. In my mind, he’s a decent scoring winger with defensive upside, but he’s behind guys like Smyth, Eberle, Hemsky, and Hall by quite a bit, and guys like Omark and Pajarvi have more promise. As a faceoff guy, he is just plain awful. The Oilers made the right choice here, but I’m not at all sold that the Ducks made the wrong choice. I think this will work out for both teams in the long run.

What are your thoughts?


Did the Ducks make the right choice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

6 Responses to “Andrew Cogliano…”

  1. chucker says:

    Way to much for the role he would have had here. Good trade for us.

    Maybe for the Ducks he turns into a top six guy and it ends up good. I am skeptical, but time will tell.

    I am glad he is gone for that price tag.

  2. dawgtoy says:

    Wow, that’s expensive! He may turn out to be Marchant 2.0, but room had to be made. Good luck in Disney Land, that contract seems kinda goofy to me. :)

  3. chucker says:

    Marchant was was better away from the puck at this stage than Cogs, and if you are paying Cogs that much to be a checker, I would suggest that is a sign of insanity. He cannot win a face off to save his life.

  4. dawgtoy says:

    Who’s to say that Anaheim will use him as a center?

  5. chucker says:

    True. Hopefully they do not. It would likely be better for Cogs and the team.

  6. Racki says:

    I am personally assuming by the $ value, they’re going to want him to be a scoring winger in their top-9… with some defensive upside. Really, what he is best at.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Panorama Theme by Themocracy

%d bloggers like this: