Comments on: More(au) trade talk

By: Craig Simpson

Craig Simpson — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:09:03 +0000

I can’t imagine what tool came up with the Giguerre for Souray scenario. That sounds like ~~Eklund~~ Twatwaffle stupidity. The only way you trade Souray is if you shed a lot of salary and get a good prospect or two in return. Tambellini would get a lengthy, rude email from me if that ever went down.

I think the best scenario is if we could unload Moreau and Staios. That sheds almost as much salary as Souray and if we get a bag of pucks for either of them, that would be just fine. They’d both be off the books and we’d have breathing room. Not to mention I think their leadership has been wholly inadequate.

By: Racki

Racki — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:13:02 +0000

I agree, M.O… on the winning the draft stuff.

By: MetalOil

MetalOil — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:47:03 +0000

I like to call him Neat”O”Rider
Besides whoever gets the top 3 or 4 picks I think the team that drafts him wins the draft.

By: DropIt

DropIt — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:30:26 +0000

Sorry Chuck, but I think you may be over valuing a couple of your players. But If tambellini manges to get even 1 more first rounder, Oiler nation should be ecstatic. That would definately be a young, dynamic team in the future

By: gr8one

gr8one — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:21:17 +0000

hehe…yeah, I call him Neonrider, but so far Nightrider is by far my favorite.