<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Break it down! &#8211; Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/</link>
	<description>Edmonton Oilers Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Racki</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Racki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttingonthefoil.com/?p=660#comment-355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would think that MacT of all people would have been all about the bottom six guys. Instead, I think he was all about making his bottom six into top six players, rewarding them with extra ice time for back checking all the time, or making nice shot blocks. Those guys bust their asses for a reason. Because if they don&#039;t, they&#039;re gone. I&#039;m a firm believer that there are 20 skaters in the lineup for a reason. Everyone is useful in their own element. But that&#039;s where they should remain. None of this Reddox on the top line stuff.

As far as Staios, I think he has his uses still. I still contest that Staios and Smid do not work now, and probably never will. Perhaps you are right though that pairing him with someone in the top 4 would do Smid some good. I have done some number crunching though and, believe it or not, Souray and Staios were pretty effective at both ends together. I know this sounds weird, but I was thinking of Gilbert and Smid together. They didn&#039;t see enough ice time to grade them, but they played well together for the ice time they got.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that MacT of all people would have been all about the bottom six guys. Instead, I think he was all about making his bottom six into top six players, rewarding them with extra ice time for back checking all the time, or making nice shot blocks. Those guys bust their asses for a reason. Because if they don&#8217;t, they&#8217;re gone. I&#8217;m a firm believer that there are 20 skaters in the lineup for a reason. Everyone is useful in their own element. But that&#8217;s where they should remain. None of this Reddox on the top line stuff.</p>
<p>As far as Staios, I think he has his uses still. I still contest that Staios and Smid do not work now, and probably never will. Perhaps you are right though that pairing him with someone in the top 4 would do Smid some good. I have done some number crunching though and, believe it or not, Souray and Staios were pretty effective at both ends together. I know this sounds weird, but I was thinking of Gilbert and Smid together. They didn&#8217;t see enough ice time to grade them, but they played well together for the ice time they got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chucker</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>chucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttingonthefoil.com/?p=660#comment-346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks pretty good to me.  I do think Smid doesn&#039;t get the credit he deserves given the limited role he&#039;s been given in the past.  Pairing him with Grebs or Souray would make sense to me.  He&#039;s really a top four guy IMHO.   A nice luxury for us for now.  

As for Staios, well, I&#039;m hoping for a bounce back year.  That&#039;s all you can hope for I guess.  Hopefully he does well and that salary doesn&#039;t look as bad as it is, but we&#039;ll see.

As for the team defense; We&#039;ll see what happens with the bottom six guys.  I think Renney will have a lot more responsibility focussed on the bottom six than even MacT did.  I&#039;m very interested to see what the new coaching staff does with basically the same team.  Should be interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty good to me.  I do think Smid doesn&#8217;t get the credit he deserves given the limited role he&#8217;s been given in the past.  Pairing him with Grebs or Souray would make sense to me.  He&#8217;s really a top four guy IMHO.   A nice luxury for us for now.  </p>
<p>As for Staios, well, I&#8217;m hoping for a bounce back year.  That&#8217;s all you can hope for I guess.  Hopefully he does well and that salary doesn&#8217;t look as bad as it is, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>As for the team defense; We&#8217;ll see what happens with the bottom six guys.  I think Renney will have a lot more responsibility focussed on the bottom six than even MacT did.  I&#8217;m very interested to see what the new coaching staff does with basically the same team.  Should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarriere</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarriere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttingonthefoil.com/?p=660#comment-343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;and makes the ladies wet&quot;. I laughed hard on that one.
I was offended when you told Racki to eff-off until he explained. He&#039;s a cool dude and if he&#039;s your bro&#039; , you must be too.
I like your writing Steve-O.
It&#039;s good to see some of the people from the oilers site here. Hopefully we all stay positive. As you&#039;ve mentioned, we do have a team to be positive about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and makes the ladies wet&#8221;. I laughed hard on that one.<br />
I was offended when you told Racki to eff-off until he explained. He&#8217;s a cool dude and if he&#8217;s your bro&#8217; , you must be too.<br />
I like your writing Steve-O.<br />
It&#8217;s good to see some of the people from the oilers site here. Hopefully we all stay positive. As you&#8217;ve mentioned, we do have a team to be positive about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Racki</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Racki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttingonthefoil.com/?p=660#comment-309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey N.O., good to see you here. 

I do agree with your team defense concept. This is something that the Oilers were once good at. However, I think the players best in that role have been traded away (this is a good reason why I want to see a defensive-minded player like Betts or Malhotra signed here). Columbus actually had gone out and picked up some quality 2-way players for depth, in the past in Malhotra, Peca and Vermette (to name a few). I really wish Tambellini would treat our bottom six (in particular) the same way. The bottom six is a perfect area to improve defensive ability, and help out the back-end. However I think Tambellini sees it more of an opportunity to develop our young kids into those kinds of players. On one hand, that does sound great if it works, but on the other hand, I wonder if it *can* work. 

We shall see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey N.O., good to see you here. </p>
<p>I do agree with your team defense concept. This is something that the Oilers were once good at. However, I think the players best in that role have been traded away (this is a good reason why I want to see a defensive-minded player like Betts or Malhotra signed here). Columbus actually had gone out and picked up some quality 2-way players for depth, in the past in Malhotra, Peca and Vermette (to name a few). I really wish Tambellini would treat our bottom six (in particular) the same way. The bottom six is a perfect area to improve defensive ability, and help out the back-end. However I think Tambellini sees it more of an opportunity to develop our young kids into those kinds of players. On one hand, that does sound great if it works, but on the other hand, I wonder if it *can* work. </p>
<p>We shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorwegianOiler</title>
		<link>http://puttingonthefoil.com/2009/08/break-it-down-defense/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>NorwegianOiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puttingonthefoil.com/?p=660#comment-308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Racki! (Compliments to you for creating a easy-to-read and interesting site) 

Quick query, are we too quick to judge defense and offense separately? The focus on individuals seem to totally eclipse the team-oriented spirit hockey is really about, in my opinion, as we continually judge teams individual by individual. That, in turn, might be a product of our time, and is by no means directed as criticism towards you (or anyone in specific). 

Like Pat Quinn said, defense is not up to the defensemen alone, it&#039;s a team effort. Which is why, for example, Columbus can appear to be a very solid defensive team - without any real stars on the back end, because they defend en masse. The Oilers&#039; defensive corps is certainly above average in terms of individual skill, but can they be a part of a true team defense? :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Racki! (Compliments to you for creating a easy-to-read and interesting site) </p>
<p>Quick query, are we too quick to judge defense and offense separately? The focus on individuals seem to totally eclipse the team-oriented spirit hockey is really about, in my opinion, as we continually judge teams individual by individual. That, in turn, might be a product of our time, and is by no means directed as criticism towards you (or anyone in specific). </p>
<p>Like Pat Quinn said, defense is not up to the defensemen alone, it&#8217;s a team effort. Which is why, for example, Columbus can appear to be a very solid defensive team &#8211; without any real stars on the back end, because they defend en masse. The Oilers&#8217; defensive corps is certainly above average in terms of individual skill, but can they be a part of a true team defense? <img src='http://puttingonthefoil.com/wpfiles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
